Impact of COVID-19 on Sedation Requirements during Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

COVID-19-associated ARDS (C-ARDS) is mentioned to express higher analgosedation needs, in comparison to ARDS of other etiologies. The objective of this monocentric retrospective cohort study was to compare the analgosedation needs between C-ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS (non-C-ARDS) on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Data were collected from the electronic medical records of all adult patients treated with C-ARDS in our Department of Intensive Care Medicine between March 2020 and April 2022. The control group included patients treated with non-C-ARDS between the years 2009 and 2020. A sedation sum score was created in order to describe the overall analgosedation needs. A total of 115 (31.5%) patients with C-ARDS and 250 (68.5%) with non-C-ARDS requiring VV-ECMO therapy were included in the study. The sedation sum score was significantly higher in the C-ARDS group (p < 0.001). COVID-19 was significantly associated with analgosedation in the univariable analysis. By contrast, the multivariable model did not show a significant association between COVID-19 and the sum score. The year of VV-ECMO support, BMI, SAPS II and prone positioning were significantly associated with sedation needs. The potential impact of COVID-19 remains unclear, and further studies are warranted in order to evaluate specific disease characteristics linked with analgesia and sedation.

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy with single use bronchoscopes versus reusable bronchoscopes - a prospective randomized trial (TraSUB).

BACKGROUND: Apart from conventional reusable bronchoscopes, single-use bronchoscopes (SUB) were recently introduced. Data suggest that SUB might prevent from the risk of cross contamination (i.e. multiresistant pathogens, SARS CoV-2) and save costs. We aimed to investigate visualization, ventilation, handling characteristics, changes in patients' gas exchange, and costs associated with both types of bronchoscopes during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT). METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, noninferiority study, 46 patients undergoing PDT were randomized 1:1 to PDT with SUB (Ambu aScope) or reusable bronchoscopes (CONV, Olympus BF-P60). Visualization of tracheal structures rated on 4-point Likert scales was the primary end-point. Furthermore, quality of ventilation, device handling characteristics, changes in the patients' gas exchange, pH values, and costs were assessed. RESULTS: Noninferiority for visualization (the primary endpoint) was demonstrated for the SUB group. Mean visualization scores (lower values better) were 4.1 (95% confidence intervals: 3.9;4.3) for SUB vs. 4.1 (4.0;4.2) for CONV. Noninferiority of ventilation (estimated by minute volume and SpO2) during the procedure could be shown as well. Mean score was 2.6 (2.0;3.1) for SUB vs. 2.4 (2.1;2.7) for CONV (lower values better). No significant differences regarding handling (SUB: 1.2 (1.0;1.4), CONV: 1.3 (1.1;1.6)), blood gas analyses and respiratory variables were found. Cost analysis in our institution revealed 93 € per conventional bronchoscopy versus 232.50 € with SUB, not considering an estimate for possible infection due to cross-contamination with the reusable device. CONCLUSION: In our study, visualization and overall performance of the SUB during PDT were noninferior to reusable bronchoscopes. Therefore, PDT with SUB is feasible and should be considered if favored by individual institution's cost analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03952247 . Submitted for registration on 28/04/2019 and first posted on 16/05/2019.

[High-flow oxygen therapy-Chances and risks]. / High-Flow-Sauerstofftherapie ­ Chancen und Risiken.

High-flow oxygen therapy (high flow nasal cannula, HFNC), in which an oxygen-air gas mixture is applied at flow rates between 30 and 70 L/min, is a technically simple and highly effective procedure for the treatment of hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency. Furthermore, HFNC can be used during bronchoscopy for oxygenation, before intubation for preoxygenation, and after extubation to avoid reintubation. The high gas flow prevents the patient from inspiring ambient air, allowing precise adjustment of an inspiratory oxygen fraction; furthermore, a positive end-expiratory pressure is built up by a resulting dynamic pressure, mucociliary clearance is improved by humidification and warming of the air breathed and the work of breathing is reduced by flushing the upper airways. Compared with conventional oxygen therapy, aerosol formation is not increased by HFNC; therefore, this procedure can also be used for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In hypercapnic respiratory failure the data are inconclusive and in this case noninvasive ventilation should currently be preferred instead of HFNC. It is important to remember that patients treated with HFNC are critically ill and therefore require continuous monitoring. It must be ensured that an escalation of therapy, e.g. to intubation and invasive ventilation, can be performed at any time.

High-Flow-Sauerstofftherapie – Chancen und Risiken High-flow oxygen therapy—Chances and risks

Mit der High-Flow-Sauerstofftherapie („high flow nasal cannula“ [HFNC]), bei der ein Sauerstoff-Luft-Gasgemisch mit Flüssen zwischen 30 und 70 l/min appliziert wird, steht ein technisch einfaches und hocheffektives Verfahren zur Therapie einer respiratorischen Insuffizienz zur Verfügung. Des Weiteren kann die HFNC während einer Bronchoskopie zur Oxygenierung, vor einer Intubation zur Präoxygenierung und nach Extubation zur Vermeidung einer Re-Intubation verwendet werden. Durch die hohen Gasflüsse wird vermieden, dass der Patient Umgebungsluft inspiriert, sodass eine präzise Einstellung einer inspiratorischen Sauerstofffraktion möglich ist, des Weiteren wird durch einen entstehenden Staudruck ein positiver endexspiratorischer Druck aufgebaut, durch die Anfeuchtung und Erwärmung der Atemluft die mukoziliäre Clearance verbessert sowie die Atemarbeit durch Auswaschen der oberen Atemwege verringert. Im Vergleich zur konventionellen Sauerstofftherapie ist die Aerosolbildung durch eine HFNC nicht erhöht, sodass dieses Verfahren auch bei COVID-19 eingesetzt werden kann. Beim hyperkapnischen Lungenversagen liegen bisher keine konklusiven Daten für die Effekte der HFNC vor, hier sollte bevorzugt eine nichtinvasive Beatmung statt einer HFNC erfolgen. Bei der Anwendung darf nicht vergessen werden, dass die mit HFNC behandelten Patienten kritisch krank sind und daher kontinuierlich überwacht werden müssen. So muss sichergestellt sein, dass jederzeit eine Eskalation z. B. auf eine Intubation und invasive Beatmung erfolgen kann.